Talk:Subshift of finite type

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Systems: Dynamical systems Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Dynamical systems.

The Finite Part of Subshift of Finite Type

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There is no explanation about how the word "finite" is related to subshift of finite type. The only statement is that the "finite" part of the name is applied when a subshift can be represented by a transition matrix. Can anyone make this more clear in the article? 128.84.79.65 (talk) 00:28, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

The alphabet of symbols is finite. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 05:08, 22 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Philosophy?

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Though there is overlap between the two subjects, I think this is more a matter of math than philosophy, no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.27.172 (talk) 01:02, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic