Disambiguating "Straw Man"

edit

This content comes from the original "Straw Man" article, which has now been disambiguated into several articles. For a full history up until March 6, 2006, see Straw man. -- MisterHand 03:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Correct term

edit

Throughout the article, the subject is referred to as "Straw man proposal", "Straw-man proposal" and "Strawman proposal". Does anyone know which one is generally preferred? 83.227.162.5 (talk) 01:47, 13 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Grammatically correct is "straw-man proposal", "'straw man' proposal", or "strawman proposal". But "straw man proposal" appears often enough in the sources cited. Tijfo098 (talk) 14:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Origin

edit

I think it originates with the US Air Force, which in the 1950s used "straw man" to refer to a crash test dummy. Popular Science. April 1950. p. 106. From test dummy to test proposal it's not a huge cognitive step. I wasn't able to find a secondary reference saying it though. There is one which says that the Air Force used "straw man" to refer to initial proposals in the 1970s, and I've added that to the article. Tijfo098 (talk) 13:50, 18 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Straw man proposal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:16, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of Steelman language requirements into Straw man proposal

edit

Stub page for a single Ada development stage (out of 9; other 8 do not have pages). Hexware (talk) 15:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ada (programming language)#History would be a more specific and, I think, better, target.Klbrain (talk) 14:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply