This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Objectivity
edit"Electronics wizard" can hardly be an objective description. SamIAmNot (talk) 13:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Why not? We nerds use it all the time, along with the term "genius". The term "enthusiast" is equivalent to the term "hobbyist". Industry hires "wizards" and "geniuses" because they innovate and get the job done. Hobbyists and enthusiasts are users, not professionals. I don't have the facts about this gentleman's background (yet) so I'm not changing anything (yet), but it seems to me that someone who has helped develop possibly one of the most important security devices for the future deserves better than being labeled as little more than a hobbyist. Accuracy in reporting facts sometimes requires being precise in descriptions, even if it means using a little tropish jargon. Whoever changed the word wizard to enthusiast probably meant well, but unless they have the facts to back it up, they have ironically substituted one objectivity error for another. And I am unanimous in that. 2600:1700:6EB0:80E0:7506:4450:EBBC:2975 (talk) 16:50, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Done I agree, "Electronics wizard" is not an objective description. Thankfully, that wording is now gone from the article. Anton.bersh (talk) 14:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Stina Ehrensvärd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150925193629/http://www.inspiringfifty.com/50-inspiring-women-list-2015-eu/ to http://www.inspiringfifty.com/50-inspiring-women-list-2015-eu/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)