Talk:Starchild skull

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Starchild skull article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3: 31 days

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 Sept 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 October 2011. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Paranormal Mid‑importance

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: Genetics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by e.w.bullock, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 2 May 2010.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article. If you've come here in response to such recruitment, please review the relevant Wikipedia policy on recruitment of editors, as well as the neutral point of view policy. Disputes on Wikipedia are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote.

Y chromosome haploroup?

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What is the Starchild's Y choromosome haplogroup please? Thanks.

208.72.125.2 (talk) 13:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

This page is only for discussing the article itself. In any case, you'd need to find peer reviewed reports to answer your question, and there aren't any. Doug Weller talk 14:55, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

FieldReports.com

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Back in 2019, I added information to this page regarding analysis of the Starchild skull that had been conducted by an organization called Field Reports but the information was removed on account of the questionable reliability of the organization. PaleoLabs, the institution that allegedly performed the DNA analysis of the skull on their behalf, confirmed for me via email correspondence that the DNA analysis Field Reports asserts was performed on the skull did in fact occur. On this note, would it be appropriate for me to at least include on this page the genetic data the Field Reports study yielded from the skull if not the phenotype-based diagnoses? Nezahaulcoyotl (talk) 00:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

See WP:OR. - LuckyLouie (talk) 12:56, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Nezahaulcoyotl sorry, but we need reliably published sources, we don't allow emails, personal knowledge, etc. Note that this report[[ttps://web.archive.org/web/20170827012419/https://thefieldreportscom.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/starchild-skull-final-report.pdf] is by a young earth creationist with, if this is accurate, a load of other problems.[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352141704_A_Degree_of_Doubt_Commentary_on_the_Alleged_Embellished_Educational_History_and_Accomplishments_of_Self-Styled_Archaeologist_Aaron_Judkins] Also interesting is this, which we can't use, not reliably published.[http://ufotrail.blogspot.com/2014/06/dr-garry-nolan-talks-ata-starchild.html] Doug Weller talk 12:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

What about this?: https://thefieldreportscom.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/report.pdf It was written by Stephen Fratpietro, a geneticist who has had works of his published in peer-reviewed journals. Nezahaulcoyotl (talk) 20:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nothing from Wordpress is going to be used in the article if it hasn't also been reported in a reliable secondary source. See WP:RS, WP:SELFPUB, and WP:WEIGHT. VQuakr (talk) 20:52, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic