Talk:Spartocid dynasty

Untitled

Reason for this post! This is the "talk" page, and concerns a site whereby opinion and fact is lacking in both cases.

Maybe this Wiki group should make a comparison with the Fomenko Group's opinion?

You might well note that the Fomenko Group considers that the term "Iberia" has become mistaken in the current history, for a variety of reasons. But notice that groups that the FG (short for the "Fomenko Group"), as well as the consensual history, consider as having a military society living in the area of the Peloponnese of Greece.

But please notice that “Iberia” has two distinct meanings, IE, one is located in the West (Spain) and the other (the present site) in the East, but both contain elements of the Spartans or Spartogos, etc. In the case of the FG, these “spartans” are deemed to be another word for “Navarrans!”, from Navarre, Spain / Iberia in the West! During the Middle Ages, or later they reportedly fought against the Athenians / Catalans who were supposedly from Catalania in Iberia / Spain in the West!

It is almost obvious that the so called “Spartogos” is strikingly similar to the word “Spartans!” You should also consider that "Sparto-cids" has to make one wonder jus how the word "Cid" or the Spanish to English equivalent would figure in the above case? I will leave it at that!

69.92.23.64 (talk) 01:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Ronald L. Hughes

Genealogy

Something has to be done about the current mess. In the first place, it is unacceptable to use a gif file; it goes against the entire raison d'etre of Wikipedia (it cannot be edited). In the second place, it has errors and inconsistencies; an example is the very first name, "Spartokus," an incoherent blend of the Greek Spartokos and the Latinized Spartocus. Can it be replaced with a normal layout like the one in the French Wikipedia? Languagehat (talk) 21:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Entire Article

Whoever originally created this seems to have either left Wikipedia, or is dormant. I fixed various of the problems and issues that were mentioned above, and added more detail to the article. I hope that I wasn't intrusive in fixing/editing it. LeukonTheBosporan (talk) 04:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spartocid dynasty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091019045452/http://www.fridmanbooks.netfirms.com/author_numizmat/Ikar/IKAR.HTM to http://www.fridmanbooks.netfirms.com/author_numizmat/Ikar/IKAR.HTM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Long what

What does "after a long with Heraclea Pontica with varying success" actually mean? ϢereSpielChequers 08:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)