Talk:Soviet cruiser Admiral Makarov (1970)/GA1

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 16:43, 26 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

will start in the next coule of days. auntieruth (talk) 16:43, 26 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  • lead is confusing. She was decommissioned because she was deteriorating, and the navy didn't have funding to repair her, right? That sentence needs clarity.
  • explain why class is different Nato to soviet
  • paragraph on aerial threat. Admiral Makarov was armed with four AK-725 57 mm L/80 DP guns situated in two twin mountings Admiral Makarov was armed with four AK-725 57 mm L/80 DP guns situated in two twin mountings to protect against aerial threats.
  • . An engine room fire sparked by a lighted cigarette thrown into a ventilation shaft by a sailor was extinguished in three hours by emergency parties on 20 February 1988. how about On 20 February 1988, a sailor tossed a lighted cigarette into a ventilation shaft, causing an engine fire; emergency parties extinguished the fire in three hours, but the engine room....
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y}
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: