Talk:Sophie Kropotkin

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Grnrchst in topic Funny grammar ambiguity

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 20:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that despite the risk of being arrested in France, Sophie Kropotkin and her husband returned to the country, as they thought detention in a French prison would be preferable to living in England?
  • Source: Woodcock, George; Avakumović, Ivan (1990). Peter Kropotkin: From Prince to Rebel. Montreal: Black Rose Books. p. 188. ISBN 0-921689-60-8. OCLC 21156316.
Improved to Good Article status by Grnrchst (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 38 past nominations.

Grnrchst (talk) 10:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC).Reply

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
  • Other problems:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   As a Brit, I think the first suggestion is more "hooky" than the ALTs. Should the cite in article be moved to the end of the relevant sentence, according to DYK rules? Mike Turnbull (talk) 14:56, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've used a colon to place the cite into the sentence. Mike Turnbull (talk) 10:46, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Needs more context

edit

The article needs at least a couple of sentences describing Peter Kropotkin's ideology and activism. As it stands, readers unfamiliar with his work are going to be left confused by the lack of context explaining the persecution they faced. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:20, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Introduced Peter Kropotkin as an anarchist communist theorist. I hesitate to add too much detail about him, as this is a biography about Sophie, not her husband. --Grnrchst (talk) 10:44, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Funny grammar ambiguity

edit

Right now a sentence in the article reads: "On 21 December 1882, hours after he died, Peter Kropotkin was arrested by the French police; he requested that he be allowed to remain with Sophie until after her brother's funeral, but they denied his request and took him to be tried and sentenced in Lyon." I believe the first he is referring to Sophie's Brother, and will fix it now based on this assumption, but the image of the french police arresting a dead man made me laugh... Willmskinner (talk) 14:57, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for catching this! --Grnrchst (talk) 15:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply