Wikipedia

Talk:Songs of Faith and Devotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page


'Rock' /Synth 'Rock'/Alternative 'Rock' / Industrial 'Rock'

edit

Why the genre 'Rock' is incorrect:

Daniel Miller Quote (p 333, in the book ‘Stripped’ By Jonathan Miller): “The thing is, they’re not a rock band... because it’s not pure [rock ‘n roll]. There’s a horrible kind of authenticity about rock music, and they’re definitely not authentic in that sense” [1]Kalied04 (talk) 14:57, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Alan Wilder himself mentioned on his Recoil website [2], Q&A Section, Songs of Faith and Devotion ... "Well, SOFAD is far from a rock album but that's another issue"

References

  1. ^ http://books.google.com/books?id=gIrZbmss3kEC&pg=PA333&lpg=PA333&dq=martin+gore+depeche+mode+%22not+a+rock+band%22&source=web&ots=67M7nujLj1&sig=Z4Iq30etb0pSfB-mvB_ceTps3Ns&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result.
  2. ^ http://www.recoil.co.uk/

Brian Eno's name in credits

edit

anyone know why eno gets a mention i notice he remixed in your room and i feel you aswell.

1,500.000 sales in us?

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

just a few weeks back wiki said it sold 900.000+ so where as these 600.000 sales come from? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.110.118.132 (talk) 22:06, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

album was leaked before release?

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm reading Appetite for Self-Destruction, and the book asserts that this album was leaked to the internet ahead of release. Sounds fishy since mp3 wasn't available and hard drives were small back then; but it still seems like an interesting point to add to the article, if it can be confirmed. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 15:05, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Songs of Faith and Devotion/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:03, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Will take a look at this Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:03, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • Article needs some discussion of the tracks and their writing.
  • One new approach to recording was performance. - sentence is meaningless - remove and let facts speak for themselves
  • though the album used a great deal of live recorded audio than previous Depeche Mode releases - which album we talking about? Also, "than" needs a comparative adjective
  • link "distortion"
  • link "outro"
  • Upon returning, they found it difficult to re-integrate as a unit, - ummm, how about "difficult to work/collaborate together...?
  • The concept of the band living and working together in the same house meant that they rarely got breaks from each other - wasn't a concept it was reality. I'd say "Living and working together in the same house meant that the band members rarely got breaks from each other"
  • The band also began to jam together, something which they had not previously done, only for fun. - huh? either they hadn't or they had..only for fun?
  • The lack of success of coming up with musical ideas from such jams led to frustration that the band were not making any progress - remove everything after "frustration"
  • The lack of progress increasingly frustrated recording. --> "The lack of progress increasingly frustrated everyone/the band."

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:   - tweaks pending as above
Manual of Style compliance:  

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:   - need to look at these
Citations to reliable sources, where required:  
No original research:  

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:   - as it stands, lacks any discussion on the songs themselves. Needs a summary at least.
Focused:  

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:  

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):  

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:   - single fair use image.


Overall: on hold. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I am failing this as no action taken for a month. It doesn't need that much but is lacking in some material. Hopefully this review will be helpful for a future reader. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:34, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

All adjustments made that have been suggested. The only thing missing is a song summary, largely because information on all tracks individually is surprisingly difficult to come by. (82.27.188.98 (talk) 20:58, 23 October 2015 (UTC))Reply
edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Songs of Faith and Devotion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Songs of Faith and Devotion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Songs_of_Faith_and_Devotion&oldid=1211375514"