Talk:Some Great Reward
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Peak Position # 54 in the US but year end # 91 ??
editstrange
how it can be that it reached only # 54 but on year end # 91?
was this in the 80s usually and common ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.204.137.54 (talk) 18:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- It also states in the opening that the album reached #51 in the US, whereas in the charts table it says it reached #54. Which one is correct? --Geach (talk) 15:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- According to the Depeche Mode discography, the album peaked at number 54 so I've changed it accordingly. --Geach (talk) 15:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
The album peaked at #54 on the Billboard 200. But as it spent so many weeks on that chart, it sold enough to be placed at #91 on the Year end chart — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:191:5FA0:1048:78CF:C9AD:9E95 (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Some Great Reward. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140804194725/http://www.infodisc.fr/Album_D.php to http://www.infodisc.fr/Album_D.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:52, 20 May 2017 (UTC)