Talk:Sol de Mañana

Sol de Mañana has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 25, 2023. (Reviewed version).

South America: Bolivia

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Bolivia.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

GA Review

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Passed. DimensionalFusion (talk) 20:19, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sol de Mañana/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: DimensionalFusion (talk · contribs) 20:12, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

This article looks pretty good at a cursory glance, can't wait to get into it

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
The prose is clear and consise, and easily understandable to a broad audience

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Appropriate elements follow the manual of style
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):
References are appropriately listed and consistently formatted.

b. (citations to reliable sources):
Inline citations are fully appropriate and back up the corresponding claims

c. (OR):
Article does not contain any original resource

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
The article does not contain any copyright violations
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):
The article addresses the main aspects of the location and goes into appropriate detail

b. (focused):
The article does not go into unnecessary detail on any particular topics
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Article does not lend any undue weight to any opinions
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
No edit warring as far as I can tell
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
Media is used really well in this article and is suitably sourced from wikimedia commons

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
All media is fully relevant to the topic
Overall:
Pass/fail:
This is definitley a great article, and I really enjoyed the use of media

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Featured picture scheduled for POTD

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Sol de Mañana 2018.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for August 03, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-08-03. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Aviafanboi (talk) 14:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic