Talk:Slow play

Gambling: Poker Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Poker (assessed as Low-importance).

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Article rewrite

Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I boldly rewrote the article. I'm still not particularly happy with it, but at least it has more of an encyclopedic tone about it now. Can anyone find a reference for fishing for overcalls? I'm not sure the topic deserves inclusion in the article. Opinions? Also, I think the term "slow play" is far more common today than "sandbag". Any consensus on renaming the article to "Slow playing (poker)"?--Toms2866 18:40, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Seems like a good idea. Slow playing and slow play is far more common. However there are existing redirects from Slowplay and Slowplaying, so perhaps one of them should be chosen. Scrunching the words together is done. On the other hand, Slow playing (poker) uses the words separately and is a normal structure so I'd support the move if you want to do that -- also setting up a redirect from Slow play (poker). 2005 19:36, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I moved the article from "Sandbagging (poker)" to "Slow play (poker)". I picked Slow play instead of Slow playing to stay consistent with the other poker articles, which tend not to use the "ing" ending: Draw (poker), Check-raise (poker), Isoloation (poker), etc. The page's edit history and talk page moved over fine. I fixed the double redirects.--Toms2866 21:09, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Check raising as a slow play

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Sandbagging is NOT the same as slowplaying, one is not a "special case" of the other. This is made clear on the link provided to Sklansky. He says they are not identical. In fact, it's worse than that -- they're not even similar. A slowplay is an attempt to KEEP people in a pot, when you have what you think is a very strong hand that will almost certainly win. A check-raise is most often used to KNOCK PLAYERS OUT of a pot, when you think you have a strong hand, but not a VERY strong hand. This goal is exactly the opposite goal of a slowplay. I think this really needs to be cleared up (Sklansky's book is a good place to start). Revolver 04:27, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I agree that Sklansky differentiates between check-raising and slowplaying as you described. There's a separate article for sandbagging (poker), so I'm inclined to mention the difference between slow-playing and check-raising and reference the check-raise article.--Toms2866 21:20, 30 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic