Talk:Singapore–United States Free Trade Agreement

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
edit

A major development in the U.S./Singapore Free Trade Agreement is the allowance of Liquefied Natural Gas to enter the Port of Singapore. The Business Times Singapore addresses that the United States/Singapore Free Trade Agreement will be key in distributing the LNG to Asia. It is important for the United States to start making efforts in exporting Liquefied Natural Gas (a resource found in the continental U.S.) as its demand is expected to rise in the near future. The Business Times Singapore also states that more U.S. jobs are projected to be generated.

Lim, R. (June 7, 2012 Thursday). FTA will ensure LNG flow from US, says consultant. The Business Times Singapore.


According to the Business Times Singapore, The United States/Singapore Free Trade Agreement has been advantageous to American multinational corporations participation in Singapore and its economy. The article points to a possible decrease in the Singapore economy will likely be held stable by the U.S. investments made after the free trade agreement by the two governments. Businesses within the United States greatly benefited by the Free Trade Agreement's clause to not impose tariffs on any goods being exported to Singapore. This has led to larger investments in Singapore by U.S. multinational corporations. Support and proof of the MNC's success in Singapore is shown in the article, where it states that, "US MNCs' assets in Singapore rose from $138US.28 billion in 2004 to $145US.29 billion in 2005."

Ming, C.P. (December 18, 2007). S'pore more attractive as hub for MNC manufacturers: US; US Commerce Dept attributes this to implementation of bilateral free trade pact. The Business Times Singapore.


The role of the United States/Singapore Free Trade Agreement took a positive change even before the treaty itself was fully functioning. The Straits Times Singapore article shows that many more business deals were proposed and accepted between U.S. and Singapore once wide spread news of the free trade agreement was broadcasted and promoted through media in the United States. The article further shows that businesses are being introduced to each other through common interests in the high tech industry. The United States is a leading edge in the high tech industry and Singapore is gaining momentum in its reputation for leading Asia therefore allowing the interest to hold.

Tan, A. (October 9, 2003) Tie-ups between US, S'pore companies triple; Reasons: Pro-active match-making by US embassy staff and higher country profile for Singapore after signing the USSFTA. The Straits Times (Singapore).


Bmnibley (talk) 16:13, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Singapore–United States Free Trade Agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:33, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply