Talk:Siege of Breda (1624)

1637 Siege

I think it is highly awkward to include the 1637 siege of Breda in this article. I propose to give the 1637 siege its own page and then delete the section in this article.--Ereunetes (talk) 19:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

I agree. I've started a separate page for the 1637 siege of Breda. Regards, Kweniston (talk) 22:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Siege of Breda (1624). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050827041003/http://www.pitt.edu/~arthome/callot/m/m.htm to http://www.pitt.edu/~arthome/callot/m/m.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060218140142/http://stadsarchief.breda.nl/actueel/Breda_750/Juni/Spinola/BodySpinola1_E.htm to http://www.stadsarchief.breda.nl/actueel/Breda_750/Juni/Spinola/BodySpinola1_E.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

details

It's strange to see only in the text summary and the info-box in the begining that explains how the siege concluded, maybe someone with knowledge could finish the rest of the page, including details of the combat?

--Byzantios (talk) 11:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC)