Talk:Shikoku dog

Latest comment: 11 months ago by Kangie.Ruu in topic Move this article to Shikoku Inu

Wolfdog?, again

edit

I've had to remove from the article the "wolfdog" text. Nowhere else have I seen that as a name for the Shikoku, and without a citation I don't think it should be allowed into the article. The shikoku, I'd wager, is no more wolf-like than any of the Japanese spitzes, or probably any spitz in general; if it is actually called a "wolf dog" by any number of people -- and this I dispute -- they're probably wrong.

edit

I had come across that article, so I added it to the Shikoku page. I'm reluctant to add more since I'm not very familiar with the breed, but I thought the new link was a little more generally informative than the current single link that was there.

Wolfdog?

edit

Does anyone have sources for this assertion? I've read ont he breed a bit but this is the first time I've ever seen it suggested that the Shikoku is more "wolf-like" than any of the other Japanese breeds.

I heard they get pretty hungry though (not unlike the wolf) 67.188.225.110 (talk) 06:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Same as Mikawa?

edit

The Japanese Wikipedia has separate articles for the Mikawa and the Shikoku breeds and does not say that they're the same. Are they actually the same? Fg2 06:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've seen German websites call it the Mikawa inu, but we should go with what the Japanese wikipedia has. Also, I think it's pretty clear that if we're going to debate whether it can be called a Mikawa inu, we should be far more reluctant to let anyone add 'Japanese wolfdog' as the dog's primary name, much less an alternative. In fact, if the wolfdog nonsense keeps popping up, I think this article should be locked. It's tantamount to vandalism to repeatedly add unsubstantiated, silly claims.
Bear in mind I don't know much about dogs, much less Japanese dogs, I just want to keep Wikipedia cleaned up. However, none of the reliable sources I've consulted, even the Shikoku clubs, make assertions that Shikokus are a type of wolfdog. There may well be some wolf heritage as this is a native Japanese breed and ancestors may have bred with wolves in the distant, unrecorded past, but that's probably true of any number of canid species that are not considered wolfdog types. I think what's going on here is that some Shikoku breeders want to attribute wolf characteristics to Shikokus, and others don't, obviously if you want to peddle Shikokus to families or in the UK (where wolf hybrids are technically illegal), you'd want to downplay the wolf heritage angle. Others might see being part wolf as a positive sales point. Still, from the WP point of view, reliable sources I can find don't support the wolf heritage contention, and no reliable references have been cited in this article that support such a contention. I think the comment I put in that some people believe that there is a genetic connection to the Japanese wolf is fair enough. Tubezone 06:59, 23 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pluralization

edit

Guys, since it's a Japanese noun, the plural is "Shikoku." Trust me.

It is generally accepted for English speakers to pluralize words taken from the Japanese language, when speaking in English. Sometimes we do, sometimes we don't. [1] seems to indicate that the use of the word on the English Wikipedia should follow however the English speakers use the word. So if most English-speakers would call them "Shikokus" or "Shikoku Inus," then that's the way it should be written here. Transentient (talk) 20:27, 17 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wording

edit

The wording of the article needs a lot improvement. Especially the section "Health" contains some very strange expressions, e.g. "as these suffer from common illnesses when not given the proper things to eat". I'd change it, but I'm lazy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.224.144.11 (talk) 23:32, 12 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shikoku (dog). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Campine (chicken) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Chihuahua (dog) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:47, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Move this article to Shikoku Inu

edit

This article should be called Shikoku Inu, in line with the usage on WP for other breeds such as the Shiba Inu and Akita Inu, the Kai Ken provides another example of a Japanese word for 'dog' ending up as the article title.

Alternatively, drop 'Inu' and 'Ken' on other articles and use Dog.

Kangie.Ruu (talk) 22:42, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply