Talk:She said, "Don't make others suffer for your personal hatred."/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 18:49, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

I'll be reviewing this article.Tintor2 (talk) 18:49, 2 March 2023 (UTC) GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Lead.

• The premise is kinda long. It deals with the introduction to the series, a background and the content of the episode. Maybe trim it a bit?
• The second paragraph features about the making of the series but instead just the themes.

Plot

• Rei Ayanami and Gendo lack an introduction.

Production

• The image was drawn by Sadamoto right? Crediting him would be good.

Reception

• The merchandising remains kinda vague. Is it possible to explore it?

@TeenAngels1234: That's all.Tintor2 (talk) 02:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Tried my best. Thank you for the review.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 11:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

The article passes the 6 criteria:

• It is well written and has the fictional information easy to understand.
• Every part of the content is referenced.
• It covers nearly everything about the episode (creation, themes,analysis, response)
• It is written from a neutral point of view.

Good work.Tintor2 (talk) 14:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)