Talk:Seton Medical Center

It is requested that an image or photograph of Seton Medical Center be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

A fact from Seton Medical Center appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 March 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Seton Medical Center was fined $100,000 when the cap of the breathing tube of an elderly woman was left on, suffocating the patient?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Seton Medical Center.

Wikipedia

Hospitals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Daily City Period

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

With the article featured on the front page at the moment, I am reluctant to edit. But the final couple sentences misrepresent the cited article. Perhaps more important, it is giving a lot of attention to one specific patient's case where the medical center was not the primary institution involved, and were the ones who ultimately made the correct diagnosis. I'd be tempted to remove the sentences entirely, or perhaps break them out into a section on 'medical complaints's ort something.

Thoughts?

Bagheera (talk) 05:23, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I agree with you, Bagheera. It's undue emphasis on 2 "bad" outcomes. Some of the negative details were added to shore up "Notability" or something. I'm going to be BOLD! --Kenatipo ^speak! 05:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Edit requested on 1 September 2020

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The request was not specific enough. You may consider leaving your comments on the Talk page or escalating significant issues to the conflict of interest noticeboard.

In the first paragraph, "...is a 357-bed AHMC Healthcare hospital..." Link to references 1 & 2 are no longer valid. Conditions of the sale were set by the California Attorney General. http://www.kccllc.net/documents/1820151/1820151200730000000000013.PDF I don't want to make edits directly, as there is potential COI. Alegh (talk) 19:34, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Alegh, and thanks for your suggestions. I'm afraid I don't understand your edit request. I get that references 1 and 2 are deadlinks. Are you asking us to replace those with kccllc.net as a reference? But I don't see any mention of 357 beds in the reference. Alternatively, are you asking us to mention the conditions of the sale in the article? If so, you need to specify the exact sentences you wish to have inserted and where in the article they should be inserted. Best, Altamel (talk) 17:27, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic