Talk:Service de documentation extérieure et de contre-espionnage
Latest comment: 2 months ago by 174.93.231.130 in topic References
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Service de documentation extérieure et de contre-espionnage article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Before 1944?
editWhat about the French secret service before 1944?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 00:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- Are you talking about the Deuxieme Bureau? --OneEuropeanHeart 04:38, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Clay Shaw
editAny evidence of a connection between Colonel René Bertrand and Clay Shaw of JFK/Garrison fame? Hutcher (talk) 05:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
History section would be easier to read if split into sub-sections
editReferences
editIt appears to me that this article could use a more varied set of sources, for balance, especially with regards to Charles de Gaulle. I suggest looking to the French Wikipedia article on the same topic - https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Service_de_Documentation_Ext%C3%A9rieure_et_de_Contre-Espionnage . Acwilson9 (talk) 04:26, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- The section on Quebec independence reads like an opinion rather than balanced account, due to its clear dislike of de Gaulle 174.93.231.130 (talk) 00:40, 10 October 2024 (UTC)