Talk:Se-tenant
Latest comment: 1 month ago by BilledMammal in topic Requested move 11 June 2024
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | On 11 June 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Se-tenant (philately) to Se-tenant. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 11 June 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 05:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Se-tenant (philately) → Se-tenant – I am not at all sure that "se-tenant" has the mentioned second meaning; I sospect the creator browsed the internets and got confused with the term "pro se tenant". In any case, per WP:MOSDAB, philately is the primary meaning, and the second one (if any) should be introduced via a hatnote. - Altenmann >talk 06:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- No objection to the move but I think some of the article is in error - there was a se-tenant production of US stamps in a miniature sheet in the 1930s. Daveosaurus (talk) 08:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.