This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
The oldest archived version of that page is 2013, which is four years after this insertion of text, which duplicates content on that site. Not definitive in itself, because pages can move or might not be archived for a number of reasons, but it suggests that if it's a backwards copyvio we may find evidence. The first minimal change after insertion of the content is reflected in the external source. That this sentence added in 2012 shows up in the suspected external source is a very strong suggestion of backwards copying. This punctuation change is carried over, as well. Other changes carried over: a grammatical change, this major text removal. That is the last major change to the article reflected in the external site. However, it's enough for me to flag this as an act of backwards copying, since it's far less likely that we copied it wrong and then modified it incrementally over years to make it similar to the external site. This doesn't mean that the content wasn't copied from somewhere, but we should not presume it copied from this site without some strong evidence to counter the signs of natural evolution. --Moonriddengirl(talk)13:25, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
.png)
