Talk:Samuel Hahnemann

Latest comment: 1 year ago by WanderingMorpheme in topic Semi-protected edit request on 11 November 2023


edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Samuel Hahnemann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

--Haendelfan (talk) 20:02, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 21 March 2023

edit

Change "pseudoscientific system of alternative medicine called homeopathy" to "scientific system of alternative medicine called homoeopathy" 1.22.224.147 (talk) 10:35, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: Nah. See WP:RS Cannolis (talk) 10:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 28 May 2023

edit

word ' psuedoscience' should be replaced by 'alternative science of therapeutics' 45.127.45.147 (talk) 10:25, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: WP:PSEUDOSCIENCE and WP:FRINGE/PS establish that pseudosciene can and should be labelled as such. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:03, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Facts are facts, alternative facts are just plain falsehoods. There is science, and anything that pretends to be science but isn't is not "alternative science". It's just plain pseudoscience, quackery, mumbo jumbo, and it can kill. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 20:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
How many people have died from homeopathy? Citations? Define "mumbo jumbo". Is that a scientific term? 99.198.56.127 (talk) 21:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
How many exactly is unknown, but this website collects cases: [1]. Another harm is that believing in it seems to increase people's gullibility.
It is consensus within science that homeopathy is very much pseudoscience.
This page is not a forum. It is for improving the article. Since WP rules say that reliable sources beat your own opinion, you have nothing useful to contribute here. --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:25, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 11 November 2023

edit

change pseudoscientific to scientific IK Rebel (talk) 09:48, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. See the above edit request and WP:PSEUDOSCIENCE and WP:FRINGE/PS. Edit requests are not meant to change consensus. WanderingMorpheme 02:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply