Talk:Ryan Lochte

Latest comment: 9 months ago by Femke in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleRyan Lochte was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 28, 2011Good article nomineeListed
March 28, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article


GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Fails 1b around lead, and 3b around staying on topic and 2b around citations. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:44, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

A 13-year-old GA that has quite a bit of unsourced content and a lead that is way too long. It was promoted 5 years before Lochte's 2016 Olympics scandal and has clearly not undergone a copyedit since. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 21:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.