Talk:Ruth Glass
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletioneditThis page should not be speedy deleted because it is based on the ODNB but is a susbtantially modified version with anoth source being used. A high correlation may be due to titles of works being included --Msrasnw (talk) 19:50, 19 May 2011 (UTC) The article - although not in my opinion a copyright violation has been deleted - discussion has taken place here on my talk page:User_talk:Msrasnw. But I have started a new version here: Talk:Ruth Glass/Temp. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 00:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)) Defense against claim of copyright violationeditThe little article at deletion had only 6 sentences.
I don't think this is a problem is it?
The line in the thing you mention - which is "Watling, a study of a new London County Council cottage estate in Hendon, on the outskirts of London, published in 1939, established her reputation as a social scientist." This is clearly different!
This is perhaps the most problematic line this is based on this line " Ruth Glass opposed the idea of research for its own sake, believing that the purpose of sociological research was to influence government policy and bring about social change, and to this end she involved herself in political debate."
This I made up based on my knowledge of her work
I don't think this is a problem. " 6 "A lasting legacy is the term gentrification a term she invented to describe the processes by poor were squeezed out of parts London and creating upper-class ghettos." This is based on this "She invented the term gentrification , giving warnings about the squeezing of the poor out of London and the creation of upper-class ghettos." I don't think this is a problem. "squeezing out" and upper class ghettos are from Glass not the ODNB author Anne Pimlott Baker The cited sources were:
(Msrasnw (talk) 09:11, 28 May 2011 (UTC))
|