Talk:Russo-Turkish War (1686–1700)
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Dushnilkin in topic Unsourced "victory" and deletion of reference
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Russo-Turkish War (1686–1700) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Russia or Turkey may be able to help! |
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:41, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Unsourced "victory" and deletion of reference
edituser:El Diablo98(currently at 4RR) has chosen to edit war instead of explaining their edit of adding "Russian victory"(unsourced) to the infobox while removing "Russia defeated in Crimea" cited by the Torke reference. --Kansas Bear (talk) 02:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- So the victory of the Turks in Crimea does not change the outcome of the war, it is a separate campaign. Anyway, according to the peace treaty, the Ottomans satisfied all the demands of the Russians Dushnilkin (talk) 15:41, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Except the source you added isn't 3rd party, it's a Russian source written by Andrey Guskov(unless I'm mistaken). Which makes it from the Russian perspective, not the neutral perspective. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- I ask you to at least familiarize yourself with the contents, and then declare a one-sided source. Russian Russian defeat in Crimea is wrong in any case, because this is one of the many companies of the early stage of the war, the result in any case was beneficial to the Russians, this is confirmed by absolutely all sources. Dushnilkin (talk) 19:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Except the source you added isn't 3rd party, it's a Russian source written by Andrey Guskov(unless I'm mistaken). Which makes it from the Russian perspective, not the neutral perspective. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC)