Talk:Royal Barge Procession

Fair use rationale for Image:Suphannahong-stamp-2.jpg

Image:Suphannahong-stamp-2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:11, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Narai-Song-Suban-Stamp.jpg

Image:Narai-Song-Suban-Stamp.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Barge-On-100-Baht-Banknote.jpg

Image:Barge-On-100-Baht-Banknote.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Barge-on-20-Baht-Banknote.jpg

Image:Barge-on-20-Baht-Banknote.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

What is a connieller?

"1 pair of ancient Thai battle boats with cannons at the bow, carrying army conniellers."

I can't find a definition for the word "connieller" anywhere, and the only uses of the word I found on the Internet seem to be in this context, sometimes even using this exact sentence. Could we find out what it means and replace this word with a less obscure one? Throughcracker (talk) 04:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

It's present in the earliest version of the article, added by User:Thaimoss way back in 2006. I tracked down the source to the Thai Barges book[1], and the corresponding passage in Thai (page 102 in the linked version) mentions อำมาตย์ฝ่ายทหาร. อำมาตย์ ammat is a historical term for certain high-ranking government officials, and some dictionaries translate it as conseiller du roi in French. That's the closest thing I found of which "connieller" is probably a typo. I'll reach out to Thaimoss to see if they have any input, but given that it's been 16 years I wouldn't expect anyone to remember. --Paul_012 (talk) 06:43, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much for all the research! I really appreciate it. Based on that context, do you think that "officers" would be an appropriate replacement? Throughcracker (talk) 05:07, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

I've changed it to "military courtiers", but the entire descriptions need some adjustment for context. As written, it seems to mix up historical and current practices. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:51, 9 November 2022 (UTC)