Talk:Roman Catholic Bishop of Arundel and Brighton

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Buidhe in topic Requested move 27 January 2021

Why the double name?

edit

Why did they decide to call the diocese "Arundel and Brighton" rather than simply "Arundel", which is where its cathedral has always been located? What is the significance of Brighton? Proteus (Talk) 16:43, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 27 January 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move, due to differing interpretations of MOS:JOBTITLES (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 03:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply



MOS:CAPS Elizium23 (talk) 18:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC) Relisting. Jack Frost (talk) 07:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Following the "(Discuss)" link from the multi-move brings me here so I assume this is the place for discussion on all these RC bishops.
Oppose: "Bishop of X" is a specific title, so the upper case "B" seems appropriate even in the disambiguated version of the title which is used as the article title. I note that there are 9 articles with titles "Anglican Bishop of ..." and none with "Anglican bishop of ..." (and vast numbers of redirects from both, mostly to the dioces concerned). PamD 12:50, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
PamD, per WP:Other stuff exists and MOS:JOBTITLES, the title is preceded by a modifier and should not be capitalized. Elizium23 (talk) 12:56, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.