Talk:Robert Sepúlveda Jr.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Robert Sepúlveda Jr. article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links
edit- http://www.advocate.com/pride/2015/08/20/watch-atlanta-approves-rainbow-crosswalks
- http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/morning_call/2015/08/rainbow-striped-crosswalks-planned-for-midtown.html?ana=e_atl_rdup&s=newsletter&ed=2015-08-13&u=z+HiUFYfj3A5KxVn3wFE+Q0399fcd7&t=1439471324
- http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/story/29645033/rainbow-crosswalksext.
- http://www.power961.com/onair/scotty-k-riley-54174/rainbow-roads-are-coming-to-midtown-13804158/
- http://www.gayapolis.com/news/artdisplay.php?artid=35443
- http://www.11alive.com/story/news/local/midtown/2015/08/12/rainbow-crosswalks-way-midtown-intersection/31572951/
- http://atlanta.curbed.com/archives/2015/07/30/rainbow-crosswalks-just-happen-midtown-atlanta.php
- http://clatl.com/atlanta/robert-sepulveda-jrs-rainbow-crosswalks-closer-to-reality/Content?oid=15090033
- http://patch.com/georgia/midtown/rainbow-crosswalks-could-come-midtowns-lgbt-heartland-0
- http://clatl.com/atlanta/robert-sepulveda-jrs-rainbow-crosswalks-closer-to-reality/Content?oid=15090033
- http://www.projectq.us/atlanta/lgbt_atlantas_own_rainbow_crosswalk_is_coming?gid=17078
- http://clatl.com/freshloaf/archives/2015/07/28/were-finally-getting-some-rainbows-in-midtown
Moving these over from the article. ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:38, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 18 November 2016
edit | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Dear Sir or Madam:
My name is Alan S. Clarke, and I am Robert Sepulveda’s attorney. It has come to my attention that some of the information on my client’s biographical page (found at the following URL: https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Robert_Sep%C3%BAlveda_Jr) violates your “biographies of living persons policy.”
As you well know, your policy requires reliable sources to ensure truthfulness and verifiability. Indeed, the policy goes so far as to require removal of “contentious material about living people that is unsourced or poorly sourced.”
Unfortunately, Mr. Sepulveda’s page contains information that is unsourced and defamatory. Specifically, Mr. Sepulveda’s page alleges -- without citation -- that he has a former name/alias of Vincent Romen, and that Mr. Sepulveda engaged in sex work using that name.
Thus, please see to the immediate removal and permanent ban of any undocumented or unreliably sourced mention of “Vincent Romen” from Mr. Sepulveda’s page. For example, the sentence reading: "During his college years Sepúlveda Jr. worked as an escort to pay his way through college and to pay his rent, under the name Vincent Romen" must be removed. Neither citation verifies the name "Vincent Romen."
I appreciate your cooperation and understanding.
Regards,
Alan S. Clarke, Esq
Personal information blanked
76.17.82.166 (talk) 15:49, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- This is probably not the best venue for this discussion. I recommend that you open a ticket on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. If the information on the Robert Sepúlveda Jr. article is incorrect, it could be properly excised/deleted. Jim1138 (talk) 17:24, 18 November 2016 (UTC)