Talk:Robert Joy

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Bisexual categories

edit

While general LGBT categories are certainly supported by the source provided, it isn't sufficient to support explicitly declaring him as bisexual — for that, we need to wait until he can be explicitly quoted using the word "bisexual" in reference to himself. The fact that he was previously married to an opposite-sex spouse does not, in and of itself, prove that he's bisexual — lots of people who are gay-not-bisexual, but were merely in the closet about it at an earlier point in their lives, have done that too. So in the absence of additional evidence about where he identifies himself as fitting into the LGBT spectrum, it's not appropriate for us to presume whether he identifies as gay-not-bisexual or bisexual-not-gay. General non-specific "LGBT" categories are fine, but specifically G or B ones need to wait until he can be properly sourced as actually using one of those two words for himself. Bearcat (talk) 17:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Robert Joy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply