Talk:Rick Kriseman
Latest comment: 11 years ago by LadyofShalott in topic What's encyclopedia-worthy
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rick Kriseman article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
|
What's encyclopedia-worthy
editI've twice removed a section listing the following professional associations:
Professional Experience Rick Kriseman has had the following professional experience:
- Attorney/Owner, Exclusively Accident Attorney, present
- Attorney, Englanderand Fischer, Public Attorneys
- Attorney, Stolba, Englander and Shames, Public Attorneys
- Wikipedia is not a site for posting resumes, and just because they're listed on the subject's public website, these jobs are in no way notable or worthy of mention here; the format only underscores the resemblance to a posted resume. 99.136.254.88 (talk) 19:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- I agree. If there can be found secondary sources that discuss these positions and some accomplishments there or effects upon his poitical career, then discuss that citing those sources. Other than that, this amounts to "he's a lawyer, and has had jobs as a lawyer". I'll reiterate that WIkipedia is not a resume host. LadyofShalott 23:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC)