 | A fact from Rheum nobile appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 June 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
I've quoted heavily from Hooker, since his words have passed into the public domain, and he gives a compelling description. With time, I suppose most of it should be rephrased into a more encyclopedic tone, preserving a sentence here and there as a short quotation. Melchoir 22:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Never mind, I've got it. Melchoir 09:31, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
original photo
editcan anyone please put an original photo of the plant...sketch is not sufficient here —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.188.98.139 (talk • contribs) 11:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- I agree, that would be great. I've listed this at Wikipedia:Requested pictures#Plants. Melchoir 06:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- William Baker has given permission for use of his photograph on wikipedia. [1] (tyger 14:51, 19 June 2006 (UTC))
- Thanks! But... it looks like Baker hasn't released the image under a free license, and we really shouldn't be using {{permission}}. I don't suppose you could ask him to mark the original as GFDL or similar? Melchoir 15:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'm new to this...so just bare with me :). What do you mean by mark the original as GFDL? He just simply said, "ok" to use the photograph on wiki. I posted the last email i got from him under the summary of the photograph.(tyger 16:31, 19 June 2006 (UTC))
- Well, I can point you to Wikipedia:Boilerplate request for permission, which probably explains the issue better than I could. Melchoir 17:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Sent an email for GFDL. Waiting for response now. (tyger 18:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC))
- Awesome. Melchoir 18:45, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Got it. Photo is under GFDL now. (tyger 01:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC))
- Perfect! You might want to be more explicit about that on the image description page, just for paranoia, but I'm not going to complain. Thanks again! Melchoir 01:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Got it. Photo is under GFDL now. (tyger 01:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC))
- Awesome. Melchoir 18:45, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Sent an email for GFDL. Waiting for response now. (tyger 18:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC))
- Well, I can point you to Wikipedia:Boilerplate request for permission, which probably explains the issue better than I could. Melchoir 17:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'm new to this...so just bare with me :). What do you mean by mark the original as GFDL? He just simply said, "ok" to use the photograph on wiki. I posted the last email i got from him under the summary of the photograph.(tyger 16:31, 19 June 2006 (UTC))
- Thanks! But... it looks like Baker hasn't released the image under a free license, and we really shouldn't be using {{permission}}. I don't suppose you could ask him to mark the original as GFDL or similar? Melchoir 15:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
New Findings
editMaybe someone can use this for this article: The genome of the glasshouse plant noble rhubarb (Rheum nobile) provides a window into alpine adaptation (Nature, 2023) Martin Mair (talk) 21:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)