Talk:Renfe Class 250

Requested move 23 August 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 16:04, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

---

• RENFE Class 250 → Renfe Class 250
• RENFE Class 251 → Renfe Class 251
• RENFE Class 252 → Renfe Class 252
• RENFE Class 269 → Renfe Class 269
• RENFE Class 276 → Renfe Class 276
• RENFE Class 310 → Renfe Class 310
• RENFE Class 311 → Renfe Class 311
• RENFE Class 313 → Renfe Class 313
• RENFE Class 319 → Renfe Class 319
• RENFE Class 319 (early versions) → Renfe Class 319 (early versions)
• RENFE Class 319 (later versions) → Renfe Class 319 (later versions)
• RENFE Class 321 → Renfe Class 321
• RENFE Class 333 → Renfe Class 333
• RENFE Class 334 → Renfe Class 334
• RENFE Class 340 → Renfe Class 340
• RENFE Class 350 → Renfe Class 350
• RENFE Class 352 → Renfe Class 352
• RENFE Class 353 → Renfe Class 353
• RENFE Class 354 → Renfe Class 354
• RENFE Class 447 → Renfe Class 447
• RENFE Class 592 → Renfe Class 592
• RENFE Class 446 → Renfe Class 446
• RENFE Class 120 / 121 → Renfe Class 120 / 121

– The operator is Renfe, not RENFE, much like Amtrak is not AMTRAK. ALL CAPS would be appropriate if the name was an abbreviation, but not the case. Propose above articles be renamed to correct. Kraushaune (talk) 04:55, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Agree Murgatroyd49 (talk) 07:28, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

• support for reasons of consistency. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 17:21, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.