Talk:Rail operating centre
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editI have written this with no gender specifications (IE signallers not signalmen.) Whilst most signallers are/were men, there are/were a handful of women employed in this capacity by the railways. The joy of all things (talk) 23:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Okay - I have changed some of the grammar and edited for spelling mistakes. Hopefully that will solve the copyedit problems. The joy of all things (talk) 08:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Removal of image
edit157.203.254.2 could you provide some instances of the security issues that you think warrant the removal of the image? It is still on WikiCommons and other such photos exist, so what is wrong exactly, please? The joy of all things (talk) 12:55, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
tyneside roc
editYork ROC will no longer control Kings Cross to the Border, due to Tyneside IECC being recontrolled and redesignated as a ROC, covering its original limits ie East Cowton to Plessey and now also including the Ashington Line. Can this article be ammended to show this please as otherwise this important signal box appears to have ceased to exist. 147.161.225.88 (talk) 23:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- 147.161.225.88 Fine, provided you can find Reliable sources to back that up? I haven't seen anything myself in the railway press, but then I haven't been looking out for that, so it's probable I have missed it. Is there anything in Rail Engineer? Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 20:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- I will get you dates when I return to work after my leave. But it definitely exists as I work there as a signaller. Patricious804 (talk) 21:21, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Patricious804 sorry, but that would be Original research. We need reliable secondary or tertiary sources. So Network Rail announce the retention and upgrade of Tyneside IECC to ROC Status (primary source), it is mentioned in, say, Rail Magazine (secondary source), then we would prefer the Rail Magazine source over the primary source. If we allow original research, then I would be free to say something to the effect that I have stood underneath Ribblehead Viaduct all day and counted that 18 trains used it. I cannot put that into the Ribblehead Viaduct article as it is original research, and not from a published source. Sorry. The joy of all things (talk) 21:32, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- These, may be beneficial?[1][2] The joy of all things (talk) 21:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Patricious804 sorry, but that would be Original research. We need reliable secondary or tertiary sources. So Network Rail announce the retention and upgrade of Tyneside IECC to ROC Status (primary source), it is mentioned in, say, Rail Magazine (secondary source), then we would prefer the Rail Magazine source over the primary source. If we allow original research, then I would be free to say something to the effect that I have stood underneath Ribblehead Viaduct all day and counted that 18 trains used it. I cannot put that into the Ribblehead Viaduct article as it is original research, and not from a published source. Sorry. The joy of all things (talk) 21:32, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- I will get you dates when I return to work after my leave. But it definitely exists as I work there as a signaller. Patricious804 (talk) 21:21, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Trackwatch - March 2022 issue". www.modernrailways.com. 22 February 2022. Retrieved 25 June 2024.
- ^ "Future plans for Tyneside ROC - a Freedom of Information request to Network Rail Limited" (PDF). WhatDoTheyKnow. 17 February 2022. Retrieved 25 June 2024.