Talk:Ragini Khanna
Latest comment: 12 years ago by MelbourneStar in topic Non-encyclopedic content and MOS:TIES
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- I have made some copy edits, corrections, formatting corrections recently. I have found some non-encyclopedic content in this article (see below). Unless a) these sections are fully sourced b) someone explains why these fan's point of view type information are needed in an encyclopedia entry I'll remove these two sections from the article!
Non-encyclopedic content
|
|---|
|
- US English and UK English are badly mixed up in the article. We need to change all to any one. If anyone has any opinion (s)he can give here or I'll change all to US English in next 1–2 days! --Tito Dutta ✉ 20:32, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
- Those two sections have already been removed - per WP:OR; and seem totally unnecessary to include in a bibliography article. I also tend to agree with you; it's either UK English, or US - in this case, US is more appropriate!
-- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 08:02, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Ya, but, we can delete "Little more about her" section too and add those information in infobox! A section (completely unsourced) just to describe her eye color, hair color etc is not encyclopedic approach, I think! --Tito Dutta ✉ 08:22, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Geez, this article keeps on giving! ;) I've reverted that section in question, per WP:OR as well as WP:BLP. Thanks! -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 08:27, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Ya, but, we can delete "Little more about her" section too and add those information in infobox! A section (completely unsourced) just to describe her eye color, hair color etc is not encyclopedic approach, I think! --Tito Dutta ✉ 08:22, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Those two sections have already been removed - per WP:OR; and seem totally unnecessary to include in a bibliography article. I also tend to agree with you; it's either UK English, or US - in this case, US is more appropriate!
