Talk:RAF Honiley
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RAF Honiley article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from RAF Honiley appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 September 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Girling (Lucas) developments labs and test track
editI don't have any reliable sources so I'm not putting anything in the article proper, but for information of anyone developing this article further I worked at this site from approx Sept 1974 to approx April 1977 when it was (and had been for some years) owned by Girling, part of the Joseph Lucas group. There was a 2-storey block on the site housing offices, laboratories and motor workshops, and the former runways were used as a vehicle test track. As I recall there was an oval-shaped track around the site and a central straight track, the middle 100metre or so long section of which was covered in an epoxy compound which could be sprayed with water from the sides of the track to make a slippery "low-mu" surface for testing brakes in ice/snow-like conditions. The main purpose of the facility at the time was developing the company's anti-skid braking products for cars, commercial vehicles and railway wagons. John Stumbles (talk) 22:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Also I came to this page via a facebook link to Puff The Magic Dragon ;-) John Stumbles (talk) 22:49, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on RAF Honiley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080313153325/http://www.army.mod.uk:80/royalsignals/30sigregt/bramcotehistory.htm to http://www.army.mod.uk/royalsignals/30sigregt/bramcotehistory.htm
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.trevord.com/navaid/ - Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.28dayslater.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=53034 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150529221423/https://heritagedriving.co.uk/contact to https://heritagedriving.co.uk/contact
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)