Talk:Pylons project
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Neutral PoV?
editPyramid is the designated successor to Pylons and sometimes dubbed "Pylons 2.0". Pylons is only the legacy project (see below). If you open the website under pylonsproject.org, it also says Pyramid, not Pylons, at the top. If you look at http://www.pylonsproject.org/about/history , it says this at the bottom:
"Pylons 1.0 and 1.1 (2010-2011)
Pylons 1.0 is a polished release of the Pylons framework, to be followed by a Pylons 1.1 in 2011 that will include additional forward-compatible Pyramid capabilities to ease the transition to the new web framework."
This notion is supported by the fact that Pylons saw its latest release in 2012, while Pyramid saw a release less than three weeks ago.
I'd suggest that Pyramid be given much more prominence over Pylons 1.x. 80.135.143.197 (talk) 17:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- I am still not sure if the content is particularly neutral or not, however, as per your suggestion I swapped the sections around putting Pyramid first before the historic Pylons framework. 2620:149:4:1501:75BD:7A70:5032:E21A (talk) 21:43, 9 March 2018 (UTC)