This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
It is plainly a BLPvio. There is no discussion or analysis of the challenged material in the source cited. It is something picked out of the primary source, which isn't even cited. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ronherry, please see WP:BLPRESTORE, specifically When material about living persons has been deleted on good-faith BLP objections, any editor wishing to add, restore, or undelete it must ensure it complies with Wikipedia's content policies. If it is to be restored without significant change, consensus must be obtained first.ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@ScottishFinnishRadish: Your last reversion was based on the "alluding" part of the source, whereas that's not even the part of the article the prose is cited to. The article quotes Swift's team: "We are aware of your public disputes with other high-profile individuals and your tactics in those interactions, including offering to stop your harmful behavior only in exchange for items of value". And Rolling Stone is not the only source in existence, there's more (12), all highlighting the part about "in exchange for items of value". ℛonherry☘18:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
One of those additional sources provides actual secondary coverage rather than reproducing the letter without commentary. It has the same issue where the secondary coverage is about one request for 50k, rather than about a pattern. We follow secondary coverage. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Nobody can "sneak" anything on Wikipedia considering everything is recorded and tracked. More like no consensus was reached in the NPOV noticeboard. Hence, your argument that it's NPOV is unfounded. Hence, nothing restricts me from adding sourced prose. Please stop gatekeeping. Regards. ℛonherry☘06:53, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ronherry Although I don't believe the paragraph needs to be abridged, I've trimmed that paragraph down to the basic facts [4] as an attempt to compromise. Let me know what you think. Some1 (talk) 23:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I don't know how it's a "compromise" when you've avoided to mention why Swift sent the cease and desist letter to Sweeney. Now it's just "Swift was criticized, and then she threatened a programmer" LOL. This is anything but neutral, but whatever I guess. ℛonherry☘06:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I added some context to that paragraph [5]. The December 2023 sentence is similar to the one on the main Taylor Swift article. Let me know what you think. Some1 (talk) 11:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I fail to see why the criticism section needs to be its own section, let alone be split off. At a quick glance, some of the information in the criticism section is already mentioned in other sections of the article (jet usage, feminism) so it does not need to be mentioned twice. A well-written article shouldn't have info written in multiple places, its just repetition. I think WP:CRIT applies here. Rfl0216 (talk) 16:12, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
