Talk:Psilocybe natalensis

Fungi Low‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Original species description

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The original species description of Psilocybe natalensis is pretty hard to find, but I have a copy if anyone needs it. You could try contacting me here, or my email address is my name at gmail.

I think Psilocybe natalensis is a valid species because the ITS sequence is a few bases away from cubensis, it has less of an annulus than cubensis and grows in grass rather than dung.

A micromorphological study of the isotype: http://www.cybertruffle.org.uk/cyberliber/59575/0072/0265.htm

ITS sequence: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/2112763395

Alan Rockefeller (Talk - contribs) 17:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic