Talk:Principal Upanishads

Dating

Why should we accept the dates given by a Western orientalist?106.51.19.129 (talk) 16:20, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

More principle Upanishads?

Why is the Shvetashvatara Upanishad not listed as an 11th principle Upanishad? I.e. is there really a hard cutoff at 10? If so, why? Rolly212724 (talk) 22:56, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Generally, there are thirteen Upanishads considered principal, as can be seen from the cited references and the general literature on this topic (both scholarly literature and the Sanskrit texts themselves). They used to be all thirteen listed here, but the last three were recently removed. I have added them back, and also added the distinction between the Upanishads associated with the Black and White recension's of the Yayur-Veda, which had also been removed. I'm afraid someone vandalised the page, because the old version was clearly supported by the cited sources, although I don't understand why. I also dont knwo how to report such vandalism, or prevent it from happening again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1811:4D16:4600:3D78:92EB:21BA:A371 (talk) 17:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

800 BCE???

This is a very inaccurate number with no proof. Lord Krishna who lived about 5000 years ago, has referred to Upanishads in His Bhagavadgita. Chandroos (talk) 07:42, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Requested move 24 September 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

---

Mukhya Upanishads → Principal Upanishads – The main language of Wikipedia is English. It would make the most sense to have the article's name in English, especially if it is referred to within the first line of the article. Raps19 (talk) 01:06, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

• @Raps19 and BarrelProof: queried move requests Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
• That sounds plausible, but does not address Wikipedia article naming criteria, such as WP:COMMONNAME. Which form is used more often in English-language independent reliable sources? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 05:03, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
• The form "Principal Upanishads" is used more often in independent reliable sources. See these four examples on the current page:
  • The Ten Principal Upanishads (1938) by W. B. Yeats and Shri Purohit Swami translates ten of the Upanishads into English.
  • The Principal Upanishads (1953) by Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan gives the text and English translation of a total of eighteen Upanishads, including the 13 listed by Hume (1921), plus Subāla, Jābāla, Paiṅgala, Kaivalya, Vajrasūcikā (Muktikā nos. 30, 13, 59, 12 and 36).
  • Hume, Robert Ernest (1921). The Thirteen Principal Upanishads. Oxford University Press.
  • Radhakrishnan, Sarvapalli (1994) [1953]. The Principal Upanishads. New Delhi: HarperCollins Publishers. ISBN 81-7223-124-5.

  Thanks! Raps19 (talk) 05:48, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.