Talk:Princess Charlotte of Prussia/GA1

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Ruby2010 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sotakeit (talk · contribs) 14:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply


"Good article" nomination

edit

Overview

edit
1. Well written?: See below
2. Verifiable?:   Pass
3. Broad in coverage?:   Pass
4. Neutral point of view?:   Pass
5. Stable?:   Pass
6. Images?:   Pass

Overall a very competent and interesting article. It is well sourced and broad in its coverage. I have no issues with the POV, its stability or the images. I have a few suggestions regarding the prose/grammar that I have flagged below; these would need addressing before the article can be passed.

I fixed very minor, uncontroversial, grammar issues myself. If you disagree with any of the edits, let me know.

Thanks very much for reviewing! Please see my replies below. Ruby 2010/2013 03:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Well Written
edit

The majority of the article is 'clear and concise' and I have seen no spelling or grammar issues. There are a few points regarding the prose that I would like to address:

  • "who ascended the Prussian throne as King Wilhelm I in 1861 and as German Emperor in 1870" (2nd paragraph, of 'Birth and family') - the clause seems a little muddled, as if he ascended the Prussian throne as Wilhelm I and the ascended the same throne as German Emperor. I would suggest "who ascended the Prussian throne as King Wilhelm I in 1861 and became German Emperor in 1870".
  • "Queen Victoria urged her daughter to act encouraging rather than reproachful towards Charlotte" (3rd paragraph, of 'Upbringing and education') - This should either be "to act encouragingly rather than reproachfully", or alternatively "to be encouraging rather than reproachful". I'd prefer the first option.
  • "Vicky's same tastes" (3rd paragraph, of 'Upbringing and education') - This doesn't read well. It would make as much sense without the word 'same'; however if you think it is necessary, perhaps a second option would be "the same tastes as Vicky"?
  • "Trousseau" (Paragraph 3, 'Engagement and marriage) - as per the tag, this needs to be disambiguated. Perhaps a link to the 'Western Culture' section of 'Wedding Dress', or even the 'Dowry' article. What do you think?
  • Image ('Relations with Feodora') - the caption to this image could do with indications of the sitters' postions, or at least of Charlotte's position.
  • "In the 1990s, a team led by Röhl inspected Feodora's body, taking samples for testing." (Paragraph 2, Medical Analysis) - What were the results of this testing? Did it prove the theory?
  • Good question. I haven't had a chance to read Röhl's Purple Secret, where he documents his findings. Instead, I've pulled information on his research from secondary sources such as Van der Kiste. The various summaries of Röhl's research have conflicted a little, so I purposely left some information out of the article that would have clarified the genetic testing his team performed. That said, I have (finally!) ordered a copy of Röhl's book and intend to update that section with what I read. It's up to you if you would like to keep this review open or not – the book should arrive next week. I completely understand if you have reservations or concerns about passing this in the meantime; I'd prefer it if you at least left this review open while I wait (since it will be easier to jump back here once I've completed my update). Thanks! Ruby 2010/2013 03:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sotakeit (talk) 15:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply