Talk:Pre-industrial society

Revising Page

I'm working on this page. Please look at my sandbox and offer suggestions.

Talk

"A traditional authority. Power was manifested in many forms of personalistic authorities instead of through an impersonal state or bureaucracy."

I'm a bit unclear about the meaning of this — does it imply that bureaucracy did not exist prior to industrialisation? Clearly not true. What are "personalistic authorities"? As opposed to today's officials of mayors, presidents, etc...

Also there seems to be a lot of conflation of capitalism with industrial society in this article, which doesn't seem entirely accurate to me. Anybody have any explanations? Peregrine981 06:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

I prefer the former redaction. The power in preindustrial societies is personal, even paternalist. The use of personal authority (and paternalism) in industrial societies is a sign of conservadurism or (in a different but no opposite way) fascism.--Ángel Luis Alfaro 09:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC) Sorry for cite wikipedia in spanish: Aunque burocracia y estado existen en sociedades tradicionales, el Estado moderno no se desarrolla plenamente hasta que el Estado Liberal se impone sobre los particularismos propios del Antiguo Régimen. En sociedades preindustriales puede ejercerse un poder personal, incluso paternalista, pero en ese caso se entiende como una pervivencia preindustrial, de orientación reaccionaria o conservadora, incluso, desde otra postura, fascista.

Another thing: in spanish wikipedia we have translated the article, and added two comments: 1-the concept (marxist) of alienation of work in first industrial revolution (in opposition to the idea of few abilities in pre industial) 2-the bycicle as a revolutionary mean of communication (allowing even biological mixture between human comunities not so possible before). I dare to introduce an image (funny I tink), but not text: my english is not well enough, perhaps somebody wants to do himself.--Ángel Luis Alfaro 09:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Maybe you could explain what you mean by personal or paternalistic? Surely personal and paternalistic authority exists in industrial societies as well - ie kings, hereditary monarchs, cults of personality etc...? Also, if you think of fairly developed pre-industrial societies, such as the Roman Empire, or perhaps the French Empire before the revolution, they had fairly large and developed bureaucracies. Peregrine981 21:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry for answer too late (I use to write in es:wikipedia). Burocracy or even State must be preindustrial, but modern state is out of range in comparation. About what I understand for personal or paternalistic, your examples are quite well of non-modern survival or reactionary orientations (even in cult of personality of stalinism or maoism, that many had compared to zarist or chinese imperial backgraund). A couple of references: Michel Foucault (in spanish Vigilar y Castigar french Surveiller et punir, Vigilance and punsih ¿?) and Ernst Kantorowicz (in spanish Los dos cuerpos del rey, The two bodies of the king¿?). There is a spanish historian of law that I like Bartolomé Clavero (Tantas personas como estados, So many people like states ¿?).--Ángel Luis Alfaro 16:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Pre-industrial society - criticism: reply

What I have said is academically correct but I did admittedly not cite references. User:Jurriaan 1 May 2007

If it is valid then it needs a source to authenticate it as such. Please consider WP:NOR. Thanks. Mister Fax 20:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

You could have a look for example at http://www.iisg.nl/research/womenswork.php This is part of a larger Dutch research programme looking at the early modern period in the Netherlands and Europe.

Criticism of the concept:

In recent times, many historians have argued that the popular concepts of pre-industrial society must be qualified and relativised. The reason is that many of the social and economic phenomena normally associated with industrial society (commerce, capital markets, wage-labour, etc.) also already existed on a modest scale in many pre-industrial societies like Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome, 15th Century North Italy and 17th century Netherlands.

Moreover, in merchant capitalism which preceded industrial capitalism within a largely feudal society, capitalist trading activity existed without mechanised factories operated by wage labour. Thus, the development of capitalist markets, in which more and more of the inputs and outputs of production are traded/priced goods and services, must be seen as a gradual process of evolution, and industrialization as a process which occurs unevenly in space and time.

Jurriaan, as long as the sentiment in the above section is from the website of which you refer to, please feel free to reinsert back into the article with the appropriate citation.Mister Fax 18:53, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

WTF

This article seems to be little more than someone's opinion on why modern man can't dream anymore. WTF is this, wikipedia is not the place for subjective social commentary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.22.180.21 (talk) 11:32, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Does any pre-industrial societies exist nowadays?

Generally speaking, Indigenous peoples is what you're looking for. Although they may be considered non-industrial, rather than pre-industrial. Kingturtle = (talk) 20:53, 17 February 2011 (UTC)