Talk:Power Rangers (film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kevin Dewitt (talk · contribs) 21:20, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Discussion

Hello Kevin Dewitt I am the nominator. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 23:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

@Emir of Wikipedia: This article passes, upgrading to GA status. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin Dewitt (talk • contribs)

@Kevin Dewitt: I see you are new here. You can ask for a second opinion if you want help, otherwise we'll stick with your pass. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:40, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

@Emir of Wikipedia: i think it's good enough.--Kevin Dewitt (talk) 15:53, 3 December 2017 (UTC)