Talk:Pink Floyd bootleg recordings
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 August 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Yeeshkul! forum
editReference to it should probably be removed as it is referenced by a link to itself, not a mention by a third-party source. OK?
Send my regards to TJ.
Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- The site can verify its own existence and that it was named after a Floyd bootleg. That's all it can claim. It's not like we're trying to spin an article out of it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:37, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Ace Bootleg Production
editAce Bootleg Production is not a real bootleg label, he's just a guy who makes artwork for FLAC files downloaded online and makes up his own title for them
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Pink Floyd bootleg recordings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091212043654/http://new.music.yahoo.com:80/blogs/getback/16847/the-10-best-bootlegs-of-all-time/? to http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/getback/16847/the-10-best-bootlegs-of-all-time
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
"Boston USA" listed at Redirects for discussion
editAn editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Boston USA and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 9#Boston USA until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)