Talk:Photorejuvenation

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Timetraveler3.14 in topic Separate Resurfacing and Photorejuvenation
edit

Please review non free content criteria. In order to duplicate material directly from other sources, copied sentences not only have to be cited, but also attributed and placed in quotation marks. There needs to be attribution, for instance, under "Scientific definition." Who said that? It's not enough to single it out and cite it; it must be attributed as well. The types are directly duplicative of other sources. For instance, see here. Citation is insufficient without attribution. Also, there are considerable sections of material that are duplicative nearly word for word of older sources. This archived version of this page demonstrates that it has been in existence since 2006. In one relevant portion, it reads:

The article as it stands now reads:

Changes in this passage are minimal. This constitutes serious infringement.

The subsequent section begining, "An intense light is applied" through the phrase "every three weeks" is a word for word copy of this source, which is archived back to to 2005, here. Obviously, this well predates the addition of the material to the article, here. This, also, is a serious infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:41, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

As the contributor of the duplicative text has indicated a desire not to revise the material, infringing contributions have been deleted and infringement-free versions restored. See here and here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Separate Resurfacing and Photorejuvenation

edit

At some point Laser Resurfacing was set to redirect to Photorejuvenation, which it is only 1 method of. I believe Laser Resurfacing should be its only article that refers to this article also. I would be willing to make it, but I don't want to do unilaterally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timetraveler3.14 (talkcontribs) 08:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)Reply