Talk:Philip Slier

Latest comment: 1 year ago by SandyGeorgia in topic Possible copyright problem
Former good articlePhilip Slier was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 17, 2021Good article nomineeListed
February 17, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 8, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that much like Anne Frank's diary, the letters of Philip Slier, discovered more than fifty years after his death, reveal the history of Nazi-controlled Netherlands through a personal perspective?
Current status: Delisted good article

Some notes from GAN

edit

Perhaps it's worth mentioning how they smuggled letters out of the camp. Today, when governments either censor all outgoing letters, or limit their amount, or ban any communications whatsoever, it's quite hard to comprehend how they did it. Retired electrician (talk) 16:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment

edit

This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist User:Doug Coldwell GA articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page—in particular, the Wikipedia talk:Good article reassessment/February 2023#DC GAs not on original 223 list. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:59, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

See WP:DCGAR. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply