| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pediatric podiatry article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.PNG)
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
 | Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Rename
editDiscussion here indicates that this article could be renamed Foot problems in children, among other alternatives. Would there be any objections to a move to this title? - 2/0 (cont.) 07:36, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose The proposed title seems inherently negative, embedding the POV that children's feet are only of interest when viewed as a problem. This would then exclude content about normal, healthy development and cultural matters such as the playing of This Little Piggy. The current title of children's feet seems nicely neutral and elegantly simple, by comparison. Colonel Warden (talk) 08:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'd suggest "Pediatric podiatry" as someone else suggested. It's a far move encyclopedic title, and one that still covers the same topic.--Yaksar (let's chat) 16:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Wow!
editI can't even say I'm surprised you have such a creepy article on this site given what I've seen the past couple weeks, and given what I know about your support for rape culture, but to target children!? You're beyond sick. Yeah. It's me. Your friendly neighbourhood vigilandal107.77.235.112 (talk) 17:38, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Name Change
editThe AfD discussion just closed had many editors suggesting a name change. Somehow that didn't get translated over into this talk page. So the problem remains. Both AfD discussions have now held that there's valid encyclopedic material here with a problematic name. The most common suggestion was "pediatric podiatry" so that's where it's heading. I'll keep this open for a couple of days for other opinions. --Lockley (talk) 21:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)