This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
His political opinions probably deserve their own section, but in the meantime, I have reverted the sentence about his latest self-published book to say:
"In 2022, Kingsnorth self-published The Vaccine Moment, a collection of his essays criticising public health mitigation of COVID-19, and espousing an anti-vaccination viewpoint."
A previous editor was correct to note that he does not outright say that nobody should be vaccinated, but the book does basically say that nobody except the immunocompromised should be vaccinated and that anti-COVID measures were driven by the sinister ulterior motives of the nefarious state. In my opinion that makes you an anti-vaxxer, and "espousing an anti-vaccination viewpoint" is the most polite and unbiased way of saying so. Unless we have another generally-agreed upon term for people who draw comparisons between anti-COVID measures and Nazi Germany, which he also implicitly does in the first chapter of that book. Dr-ziego (talk) 08:33, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Clearly, The Vaccine Moment is a critique of the response to the pandemic rather than the efficacy and safety of the vaccine. The vaccine itself is not the focus of the essays; Kingsnorth notes that he is not against vaccination and that the vaccine is effective.
Generalising the papers as "anti-vaccination", a term that clearly carries heavy connotations, feels dishonest, and I feel the sentence is simply more accurate without the addition.
At the risk of launching an edit war, I'm going to revert the change. Ultimately I think his view on the matter is complex enough to necessitate an extra sentence or two to clarify, and I am open to suggestions. Slamslamslamslamslam (talk) 20:45, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
