Talk:Palar River

Don't merge

It's very confusing when rivers don't have their own name, just as it is when the District and a city are not separate. The same confusion occurs when a temple is under the name of the town it is in instead of the temple's name. Mattisse(talk) 20:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Merge

I went ahead and merged Palar and Palar River, as they both referred to exactly the same thing and both had almost exactly the same content. phoebe 05:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Article content

The article content mentions about an current issue related to the river in the main para...i suggest the issue can be mentioned in a seperate paragraph titled " Issues related to the river"...i do understand the depth of issue being dependent on it for drinking water supply.

Also ponnaiyar(south pennar) is not tributory of palar...we would strive to maintain the neutrality of the article...so try an disinterested approach and please avoid mentioning the contributor's name in the article..thanks--Prakt 16:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)prakt

Unerefenced material

There is a lot of material which is unreferenced in the article. If whoever has added is not going to provide reference in a reasonable time, I am going to delete it. Docku (talk) 02:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

The Hindu source

• http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/water-flows-into-palar-after-almost-a-decade/article7868057.ece

Placing this here for the time being, as the material in the article citing it was directly plagiarized from this article. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 03:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Tamil Nadu topo deutsch mit Gebirgen.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:10, 23 January 2023 (UTC)