Talk:Oppidum of Manching

[Untitled]

Please confirm somehow (I'd be interested to see how) that "pfostenschlitzmauer" is the terminus technicus in English (which I strongly doubt; every English page online uses "timber-laced rampart" to mean what the term "Pfostenschlitzmauer" refers to in German). If it is, I would recommend to change "timber-laced rampart" to "pfostenschlitzmauer" throughout the article. If it is not, the change from

"the murus gallicus or Gaulish wall commonly found in Western Europe, and the pfostenschlizmauer or timber-laced rampart mostly used in the East." (by Mikhailfranco; 18 November 2006)

to

"the murus gallicus or Gaulish wall commonly found in Western Europe, and the pfostenschlitzmauer or post slot wall mostly used in the East." (by 62.6.162.98; 20 November 2006)

should be discussed for a start. Then a change to simply "timber-laced rampart" might be the right thing to do. And especially the name of the english Wikipedia article "pfostenschlitzmauer" should be changed to "timber-laced rampart".

L.S. 19:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Update

I made a major update, extending the aricle with images and adding much text based on the German wiki article. Hope that's ok. athinaios 13:30, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

There appears to be a spelling mistake under the catagory The settlement: Forticfications, the word 'fore' is used, but I can't work out what exactly was meant by the author. In context:

"This gate was destroyed by fore in 80 BC, its ruins were never cleared, suggesting that the road which it had served was out of use by that time." (by athinaios; 23:23, 13 October 2007) (My emphasis)

Perhaps the proper meaning can be discerned from the German wiki it was translated from. The Mackstar 07:48, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Oppidum of Manching. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927003212/http://www.dainst.org/index_107_de.html to http://www.dainst.org/index_107_de.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929092013/http://www.dainst.org/print.php?id=151 to http://www.dainst.org/print.php?id=151
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012035201/http://www.dainst.org/spuren/index_3364_de.html to http://www.dainst.org/spuren/index_3364_de.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 5 December 2017 (UTC)