Talk:Om Parvat

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Name/identity of peak

edit

It's unclear to me if Om Parvat is really the same as Adi Kailash. The height is also quite uncertain, as is now stated in the article. One of the American Alpine Journal articles notes that the names and identities of the peaks in this area are quite unclear, and that the map they had to use was inaccurate. The Himalayan Index is also confusing, with multiple suspiciously similar hits for "Kailas"/"Kailash". So a definitive reference, if one exists, would be most helpful. -- Spireguy 03:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Spireguy, I'm pretty sure Om Parvat and Adi Kailash are different mountains. Adi Kaliash is a very distinctice peak, like a snow pyramid, with the band of rock running across it that you describe, when seen from Jolinkong temple. If you like, I can send you a photograph of it showing this.

The height is also lower, around 5900 metres. All the US DOD mountain heights for the area seem to be about 200 metres out. The Indian military maps are restricted. Team member Paul Zuchosky was very disappointed to find this out - his target was for a virgin 6000 metre peak!

Regards

Diarmid —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.144.2 (talk) 16:48, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

The height is certainly below 20,000 ft since the higher peak to the south is just over 20,000.

Piolet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.129.126.242 (talk) 17:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Adi Kailash and Om Parvat are two different peaks. Om Parvat - as the name suggest, resembles hindu character OM. Whereas Adi Kailash is considered replica of Mt. Kailash. Adi Kailash is more towards Tibet, whereas Omparvat marks the tri junction point - bordering India, Nepal and Tibet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaushalchandak (talkcontribs) 09:40, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Question about location

edit

I always read that om parvat is in uttaranchal (or uttarakhand), but here it says its in nepal. Can you check this? http://www.uttarakhandtourism.net/trek_om_parwat.htm

Answer : Explore Trip To Temples Om Parvat more. Om parvat touches Nepal, Tibet & India at its 3 sides but Sign of Om is visible from India side only.

Coordinates

edit

{{geodata-check}}

Please note that the coordinates in this article need fixing as:

  • 30.12.19.66N
  • 81.02.56.04E
Source? Google Maps uses the same co-ordinates as Wikipedia at present. Mephistophelian (talk) 22:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Done. BrainMarble (talk) 04:29, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Om Parvat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:43, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Om Parvat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply