Talk:Olympic Australis

Australia: South Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Olympic Australis is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Gemology and Jewelry: Gemstones Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Gemstones subpage.

No longer the largest

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

According to [this], [this], [this], and so on, an even larger (much larger) stone has been found. Figured I'd drop this bit of info for anyone watching and/or editing this page. Lost on Belmont (talk) 22:06, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Gee, a freaking picture would help

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is the problem with the draconian and somewhat anal limitations to posting Photos. Most of the editors on Wikpedia are anal anyway. I once paid $50 for publishing rights to a photo, and the nice mother's basement dwelling lad kept removing it because I could not provide "documentation". Another reason not to take Wik seriously.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.24.171.178 (talk • contribs) 03:54, 12 May 2012 (UTC)‎Reply

Add topic