| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Old Serbia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Maps
editMost maps in article do not show Old Serbia. They would be more in line with the article about Greater Serbia. Most importantly, sources do not discuss Old Serbia. That is the perfect example of WP:OR and WP:COAT.--WEBDuB (talk) 09:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- A dispute about the maps, doesn't mean that you should tag the entire article. We can discuss a solution but you should remove the tags.--Maleschreiber (talk) 10:00, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- The article has a lot of issues. One of the “mythbusters” WP:CFORK and WP:POVPUSH, with a focus on the negative aspects of terms and events from Serbian history. It is, to say the least, POV and UNDUE. However, current maps are obviously policy violations and when they are removed, templates will be removed as well. They totally miss the point and show some other geographical determinants.--WEBDuB (talk) 10:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)